关于慈善公益的英语美文

慈善表面看是帮助了别人，是别人受益了，其实是双方的，别人受益的同时，你的内心得到了快乐和满足;每个人都觉得这个慈善事情是双方受益的，这个慈善才会人人介入，人人才会不断做。小编精心收集了关于慈善公益的英语美文，供大家欣赏学习!

关于慈善公益的英语美文：安德鲁·卡内基和他的慈善事业

Carnegie spent almost twenty years left to him giving his wealth away. He believed that those who became rich should return what they did not need to society. He had said that a rich man "dies disgraced" if he does not use the ability he has shown ingathering money to give away his money for the public good during his lifetime.

卡内基花了将近二十年的晚年岁月来分散自己的财富。他认为那些发了财的人应该把他们不需要的钱都归还给社会。他曾经说过，一个富人在他活着的时候不把他在积累财富上所显示的才能用来为公共利益，将他的钱财分散出去的话，他死也“死得不光彩”。

He began to use his money to build free public libraries. In 1919 it was said that his money had built almost 3,000 libraries, valued altogether at over sixty million dollars. Most of these were in the United States, but some of them were in Canada, Great Britain, New Zealand, and even as far as the Fiji Islands.

他开始把他的钱用来兴建免费的公共图书馆。1919年，据说他的钱已经兴建了差不多三千座图书馆，总共估价大约六千万美元以上。这些图书馆大多数都在美国，但其中一部分在加拿大、英国、新西兰，甚至远在斐济群岛。

A gift of four million dollars was made to Carnegie's hometown, Dunfermline, Scotland. It was used to build parks and playgrounds for the people of the town. Pittsburgh, where he made his fortune, was given a music hall, a museum, an art gallery, and a public library.

一份四百万美元的馈赠被送给了卡内基的故乡苏格兰邓费尔姆林。那笔款是用来为该镇人民修建公园和运动场的。匹兹堡是他发边的地方，他为该市兴建了一座音乐厅、一个博物馆、一个美术馆和一座公共图书馆。

Andrew Carnegie's public gifts amounted to almost three hundred and thirty million dollars. He gave one million, five hundred thousand dollars to the Peace Palace at the Hague in the Netherlands. After the war began in Europe in 1914, he gave his home, Skibo Castle in Scotland, to the British Government for use as an army hospital.

安德鲁·卡内基的热心公益的馈赠达到三亿三千万美元左右。他赠给荷兰海牙和平官一百五十万美元。1914年战争在欧洲爆发后，他把自己在苏格兰斯基波城堡的住宅赠给英国政府用作陆军医院。

关于慈善公益的英语美文：慈善组织 Charity organization

When people suffer some natural disasters and are confronted with difficulties, they mayexpect the aid from others, especially charity organizations. However, there is an opinion thatcharity organizations should help people of their own country instead of giving aid to whoeverin need. From my perspective, the aid should be given to those in need regardless of theirnationality.

Natural disasters, war or social turmoil, all these factors may render people fall intopoverty and diseases. The rise of charity organizations is associated with the emergence ofthese disasters. They relieve people from great sufferings and give people in need hope ofsurvival. However, there is an opinion that aid from charities should only be given to peopleliving in their countries while others think that charity should benefit all people. I tend tobelieve the latter is of more justification.

To help those in great needs is a reflection of moral obligation/duty for human beings.(意义) And this practice of helping others will have numerous/many positive effectsinvolving/including promoting economic development and enhancing social harmony. (影响和作用)Meanwhile, the aid from charity organizations may cover a wide range of people and may bemore transparent. However, there are some disadvantages of charity organizations. Themoney donated by charity organizations may be taken away by local officials and cannot reachthose who are really in need. What’s more, charity organizations tend to give aid to thoseareas which are frequently reported by the media. This will cause regional imbalance or evenregional conflict.

As for those who advocate that aid for charity organization should be given to peopleliving in their own country, I hold conservative attitude. There is no denying that it is moreeffective for charity organizations to give aid to local people. However, how to ensurefairness/equality among different peoples is the priority for charities. Fair distribution ofresources and aid is an objective reflection of human virtues. (反证)If every individual or everyorganization just focus on their own interest, the world will become indifferent andunfriendly.

In conclusion, charity organization should give aid to people who are in great needwithout considering their social background, their nationality and something irrelevant.However, the aid should be supervised and monitored by some independent organizations forfear of corruption or embezzlement. / However, the aid should be controlled or supervisedby some dependent organizations so that it can reach the targeted people.

关于慈善公益的英语美文：The kindness of strangers 有感于陌生人的慈善心怀

How much empathy do you feel towards other people? If you saw someone fall off their bike in traffic, would you stop and help - or just walk away? Many people would give in to apathy, go about their business and just do nothing. So it was a big surprise when about 100 bystanders got together recently to move a bus in east London to help a cyclist trapped under it. A video of the incident went viral on social media.

According to Zoheb, a driver who stopped his car to take part in the rescue, about five people gathered to move the bus. He says: "There was no chance we could do it, it was more an invitation for other people to help, really."

The initiative paid off. Diners from nearby restaurants joined in. There wasn't much coordination but it didn't take long to develop a collectiveunderstanding of what the objective was.

Spontaneous collaboration among strangers doesn't happen often. People in a crowd are not sure what to do - they don't have a plan. It's one of the reasons bystanders often do nothing, according to Dr Mark Levine, professor of social psychology at Exeter University in Britain. "The presence of others can inhibit you from helping", he says.

The key to positive group behaviour and intervention, Levine explains, "is building a sense of shared identity". Action has to be decided quickly, Levine says. "The longer you leave it, the harder it is to make a decision. If you don't immediately act then you kind of think 'Well, actually I probably couldn't have done anything anyway'."

But the people who took the initiative like Zoheb might make a difference. The cyclist ended up in hospital and the images of the collective effort might inspire others to more acts of solidarity.